mainbanner

Carbon dating is Totally Flawed at its Core

Carbon dating was not invented until 1949. Yet schools started to teach that the earth is billions of years old, way back in 1830, the reasoning was not because of carbon dating. Carbon dating had not even been thought of yet. So why were they teaching that the earth was billions of years old back in the 1800's ?

Because billions of years is what was needed in order to make the evolution theory look at least half way feasible. Without billions of years in order to hide behind, the theory looks absolutely ridiculous. This goes hand in hand with the heliocentric model they were also trying desperately to push at that time. As mentioned in the previous section, Evolution does not work without Heliocentrism and visa-versa.

The lengths that the scientific community has gone to try and make things fit into their evolutionary paradigm is nothing short of insane. They have come up with billions of years to explain away various aspects of creation. Millions or billions of miles of distance to try and explain their Big Bang Theory which once again is coupled along with Heliocentrism and on and on and on. It's Absolutely and Totally Absurd.

However, there is much, much more evidence then just carbon dating when it comes to determining the age of the earth. But once again, scientists bury this evidence when it does not fit into their evolutionary and heliocentric paradigms.

It really is a shame that these people are allowed to hide such evidence from the public, but this is not the worse part of it, as without bringing this evidence to the surface exactly how are people suppose to make a fundamental decision on the origin of earth and its age ?

This is perhaps the main reason why people are so confused when it come to trying to figure all of this out. Most of them know that the evolutionary theory doesn't seem right, and that there is something flawed with it, but they are assured that it has been proven, WHEN IT HAS NOT. In fact it is perhaps one of the dumbest theories that has ever been devised.

Either there is a lot of money changing hands in the scientific community to keep the evidence suppressed, or these scientists are among the dumbest people on the face of the earth. As to have all of these different degree's and doctrines that they hold and to not be able to figure this out is absolutely ridiculous to put it mildly.

I am going to present some fantastic videos below that show beyond a shadow of a doubt that we have also been lied to about the age of our earth. People have ignored the evidence that has been found and have continued to use methods that frankly DO NOT WORK in order to keep the evolutionary theory alive. Just keep in mind that all I can do is show you the material, it is entirely up to you to draw your own conclusions on this matter.

Well long after I uploaded this page I ran across this video of an article that appears in virtually all of the Mainstream newpapers and media of scientists (so falsly called) discovering some new form of humaniod in a Philippine cave.? I just had to put this up to lead off this section as this is what they are teaching people all around the world, and the worst part of it all is that they just buy it up.??? These people have the majority of the world so brainwashed with all of this balogna it is not even funny any more. And it seems that there is no end in sight, as people either can't wake up, or do not want to wake up out of this dreamland that is being pulled over their eyes in order to hide the truth. It is utterly amazing.

Mainstream Finds A New Human Species. Huh.?

So as I had mentioned in the closing of the above introduction it seems that The Mainstream is pushing a so called new find of human bones that they are attempting to put a label to as a "New Human Species". Well folks between you and I, who ever believes this garbage best be getting off the fake history channels and away from Mainstream science and start looking at things that directly reflect our true history on this earth, as this is almost laughable. I put this up in this section because of how they magically come up with this astonishing numbers when dating these so called fossels. It never ceases to amaze me at how this pile of bones they say are 1.5 million years old and those over there are 600 thousand years old and on and on and on with this nonsense. As we will see as we make our way through this section Carbon Dating is useless and does not work at all, never mind being in any way accurate. Boy oh boy there is some serious work to be done in waking people up to all of this.

Taking a look at Carbon Dating and Creation

This video shows the various aspects of Carbon Dating and the Flaws that are accompanied with it. We will also see the lengths in which the main stream will go to keep this evidence covered up. They have even gone so far as to get to, and sway verdicts in cases that deal with Creation. Thus, continuing to try and hide God and His creation, while keeping totally false teachings within our school systems. It is utterly amazing as to the lengths they will go to try and keep all of the evidence that is found on this topic suppressed. It's absolutely stunning to imagine that when something is found that is contrary to what they are teaching, they just brush it off and do not give it a second look. I personally feel that there has got to be an agenda behind this, as why in the world would evidence of any sort having to do with fundamental teaching be tossed aside ? This whole paradigm is totally out to lunch, false and without merit, but yet it's held as truth and pushed out in the education system and mainstream science. I wonder, when did science stop being science and turn into pseudoscience ? We can thank the mainstream media for withholding basically everything having to do with creation from the general public. It is their job to act as Gatekeeper's and only tell the public what they want them to know, regardless if it is fact or total evolutionary fiction.

Carbon 14 Dating Disproves Evolution

Many people are under the false impression that carbon dating proves that dinosaurs and other extinct animals lived millions of years ago. What most do not realize is that carbon dating is not used to date dinosaurs. The reason.? Carbon dating is only accurate back a few thousand years. So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, they would need to date it another way. But here is the problem. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says). They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notions. What would happen if a dinosaur bone were carbon dated? - At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Scientists dated dinosaur bones using the Carbon dating method. The age they came back with was only a few thousand years old. This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. So what did they do? They quickly threw the results out. And kept their theory that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" instead... You have to be kidding me ?

The Young Age of the Earth

The Young Age of the Earth is a 76 minute VHS/DVD video which explains how a created, young Earth, is compatible with a myriad of field evidences and the Genesis record of creation in six literal days. Dr. Robert V. Gentry and his son, David present young earth evidences supporting rapid coal formation such as polonium halos in coalified wood and the astonishingly pure giant coal beds of the Powder River Basin. These coal beds, sometimes hundreds of feet thick, are better explained by a rapid deposition and burial of billions of tons of vegetation by a massive flood mechanism. Present day oil formation in the Guaymas Basin is seen using deep sea footage from DSV Alvin. Aerial and ground based footage of the Grand Canyon illustrate features which question whether the Colorado River carved the canyon over millions of years. WARNING: This is information THAT YOU WILL NOT HEAR ABOUT from mainstream media, or the scientific community. They will do what ever they can in order to suppress this evidence.